Taxonomic and functional diversity of the microbiome in a jet fuel contaminated site as revealed by combined application of in situ microcosms with metagenomic analysis.

Natural attenuation represents all processes that govern contaminant mass removal, which mainly occurs via microbial degradation in the environment. Although this process is intrinsic its rate and efficiency depend on multiple factors. This study aimed to characterize the microbial taxonomic and functional diversity in different aquifer sediments collected in the saturated zone and in situ microcosms (BACTRAP®s) amended with hydrocarbons (13C-labeled and non-labeled benzene, toluene and naphthalene) using 16S rRNA gene and "shotgun" Illumina high throughput sequencing at a jet-fuel contaminated site. The BACTRAP®s were installed to assess hydrocarbon metabolism by native bacteria. Results indicated that Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were the most dominant phyla (~98%) in the aquifer sediment samples. Meanwhile, in the benzene- and toluene-amended BACTRAP®s the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria accounted for about 90% of total community. In the naphthalene-amended BACTRAP®, members of the SR-FBR-L83 family (Order Ignavibacteriales) accounted for almost 80% of bacterial community. Functional annotation of metagenomes showed that only the sediment sample located at the source zone border and with the lowest BTEX concentration, has metabolic potential to degrade hydrocarbons aerobically. On the other hand, in situ BACTRAP®s allowed enrichment of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria. Metagenomic data suggest that fumarate addition is the main mechanism for hydrocarbon activation of toluene. Also, indications for methylation, hydroxylation and carboxylation as activation mechanisms for benzene anaerobic conversion were found. After 120 days of exposure in the contaminated groundwater, the isotopic analysis of fatty acids extracted from BACTRAP®s demonstrated the assimilation of isotopic labeled compounds in the cells of microbes expressed by strong isotopic enrichment. We propose that the microbiota in this jet-fuel contaminated site has metabolic potential to degrade benzene and toluene by a syntrophic process, between members of the families Geobacteraceae and Peptococcaceae (genus Pelotomaculum), coupled to nitrate, iron and/or sulfate reduction.

Comparison of different protocols for the extraction of microbial DNA from reef corals

This study aimed to test different protocols for the extraction of microbial DNA from the coral Mussismilia harttii. Four different commercial kits were tested, three of them based on methods for DNA extraction from soil (FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil, MP Bio, PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit, MoBio, and ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit, Zymo Research) and one kit for DNA extraction from plants (UltraClean Plant DNA Isolation Kit, MoBio). Five polyps of the same colony of M. harttii were macerated and aliquots were submitted to DNA extraction by the different kits. After extraction, the DNA was quantified and PCR-DGGE was used to study the molecular fingerprint of Bacteria and Eukarya. Among the four kits tested, the ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit was the most efficient with respect to the amount of DNA extracted, yielding about three times more DNA than the other kits. Also, we observed a higher number and intensities of DGGE bands for both Bacteria and Eukarya with the same kit. Considering these results, we suggested that the ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit is the best adapted for the study of the microbial communities of corals.

Comparison of different protocols for the extraction of microbial DNA from reef corals

This study aimed to test different protocols for the extraction of microbial DNA from the coral Mussismilia harttii. Four different commercial kits were tested, three of them based on methods for DNA extraction from soil (FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil, MP Bio, PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit, MoBio, and ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit, Zymo Research) and one kit for DNA extraction from plants (UltraClean Plant DNA Isolation Kit, MoBio). Five polyps of the same colony of M. harttii were macerated and aliquots were submitted to DNA extraction by the different kits. After extraction, the DNA was quantified and PCR-DGGE was used to study the molecular fingerprint of Bacteria and Eukarya. Among the four kits tested, the ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit was the most efficient with respect to the amount of DNA extracted, yielding about three times more DNA than the other kits. Also, we observed a higher number and intensities of DGGE bands for both Bacteria and Eukarya with the same kit. Considering these results, we suggested that the ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit is the best adapted for the study of the microbial communities of corals.

Comparison of different protocols for the extraction of microbial DNA from reef corals.

This study aimed to test different protocols for the extraction of microbial DNA from the coral Mussismilia harttii. Four different commercial kits were tested, three of them based on methods for DNA extraction from soil (FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil, MP Bio, PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit, MoBio, and ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit, Zymo Research) and one kit for DNA extraction from plants (UltraClean Plant DNA Isolation Kit, MoBio). Five polyps of the same colony of M. harttii were macerated and aliquots were submitted to DNA extraction by the different kits. After extraction, the DNA was quantified and PCR-DGGE was used to study the molecular fingerprint of Bacteria and Eukarya. Among the four kits tested, the ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit was the most efficient with respect to the amount of DNA extracted, yielding about three times more DNA than the other kits. Also, we observed a higher number and intensities of DGGE bands for both Bacteria and Eukarya with the same kit. Considering these results, we suggested that the ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit is the best adapted for the study of the microbial communities of corals.

Bioremediation of a weathered and a recently oil-contaminated soils from Brazil: a comparison study.

The facility with which hydrocarbons can be removed from soils varies inversely with aging of soil samples as a result of weathering. Weathering refers to the result of biological, chemical and physical processes that can affect the type of hydrocarbons that remain in a soil. These processes enhance the sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs) to the soil matrix, decreasing the rate and extent of biodegradation. Additionally, pollutant compounds in high concentrations can more easily affect the microbial population of a recently contaminated soil than in a weathered one, leading to inhibition of the biodegradation process. The present work aimed at comparing the biodegradation efficiencies obtained in a recently oil-contaminated soil (spiked one) from Brazil and an weathered one, contaminated for four years, after the application of bioaugmentation and biostimulation techniques. Both soils were contaminated with 5.4% of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and the highest biodegradation efficiency (7.4%) was reached for the weathered contaminated soil. It could be concluded that the low biodegradation efficiencies reached for all conditions tested reflect the treatment difficulty of a weathered soil contaminated with a high crude oil concentration. Moreover, both soils (weathered and recently contaminated) submitted to bioaugmentation and biostimulation techniques presented biodegradation efficiencies approximately twice as higher as the ones without the aforementioned treatment (natural attenuation).